Quick Hits From Sugar Land
Wed, 06/27/2007 - 3:00pm
Two bits of interesting news this afternoon, both concerning Texas 22nd Congressional District.
From the Man-Who-Used-To-Be-There Department: The dismissal of a conspiracy indictment against Tom DeLay was upheld today on grounds that it wasn't exactly illegal yet when he did his conspiring. The events in question took place in 2002, and they weren't made illegal by election code additions until late 2003. Statesman has that story.
And from the Just-When-You-Thought-It-Was-Safe-To-Be-A-Congressional-Staffer Desk at the Chron comes the news that Shelley Sekula Gibbs is firming up her intentions to run against Nick Lampson for the TX-22 seat in 2008. And no, I didn't spell her name wrong — she legally had the hyphen removed. She is currently going to great pains to publicize her list of supporters, which includes Bob Perry. Perry's support is not insubstantial, obviously, so the primary for the GOP nomination in that district should more or less amount to a bloodbath.

RE: Decision for Delay by Republican Court no surprise
By JasonCNSmith
Wed, 06/27/2007 - 6:41pm
The decision by the Republican result oriented Court of Criminal Appeals should be no surprise. The Court of Criminal Appeals, many of its members who have allowed politics to influence its decisions before and who ALWAYS side with prosecutors who appeal to it to allow cases to proceed against those accused, finally found a case in which it concluded that charges should not be allowed to go forward. In cases involving often involving minorities and even Democrats, the Court of Criminal Appeals has ignored decisions of lower Courts terminating prosecutions and required cases to go forward. One can easily conclude that the majority ruled for the accused (DeLay) because he is a powerful Republican figure.
To be fair, there are many Republican judges in Texas who do believe in the rule of law, who work hard to keep politics out of the courts and to focus on doing justice. However, the Republican Court of Criminal Appeals normally rules for the prosecutors and, thus, the majority's sudden ruling for an accused who happens to be Republican Tom Delay should be viewed with skepticism. This apparent double standard approach by the Court's majority makes folks question whether the rule of law or the rule of Republicans was applied in DeLay's case.
Jason C.N. Smith
Fort Worth, Texas
"I am not a member of any organized party. I am a Democrat"
--Will Rogers
So true
By George Nassar
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 9:00pm
The day when we can get some fresh blood in the Court of Criminal Appeals, I'll be throwing a party. That is in my mind one of the biggest unsung problems in Texas politics.
RE: Delay still faces charges
By JasonCNSmith
Wed, 06/27/2007 - 6:43pm
Delay still faces criminal charges. I hope his jury judges on the facts and not based upon his politics.
Right
By Josh Berthume
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 8:01am
Oh, money laundering. I don't see how those charges go away.
Dracula Gibbs
By John McClelland
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 9:22am
I don't see how any Republican would support her re-bid to go up against Lampson. She ran off DeLay's former staffers when she was in their the first time. And I am pretty sure you are borderline insane if you can run off people who worked for Tom DeLay.
Special
By Josh Berthume
Thu, 06/28/2007 - 10:14am
That does imply a certain specialness.