Skip navigation.
The Texas Blue
Advancing Progressive Ideas

LaRouche, Etc. (Updated)

LaRouchePAC is back on the scene just ahead of this week's Texas Democratic Party State Convention, brandishing a press release detailing a request for support and / or an endorsement from TDP Vice Chair Roy LaVerne Brooks. Brooks is running against incumbent TDP Chairman Boyd Richie for that leadership position.

UPDATE: Apparently the press release was wrong. Post updated with new information.

Here is the statement and correction sent last night by Michael Maddi, speaking on behalf of LaRouchePAC, reproduced in part:

The press release is not accurate in stating that Roy LaVerne Brooks asked for the endorsement of the LaRouche Political Action Committee and never actually states that she sought Lyndon LaRouche's personal endorsement. It is the case that she contacted Kesha Rogers to ask Kesha to support her campaign.

As I'm sure you remember, Kesha was one of four candidates two years ago for Texas Democratic Party Chair. I believe that many of the delegates were tremendously impressed by Kesha's optimism and passion for building the Democratic Party across the state. I can't speak for Ms. Brooks, but I believe that's what motivated her to seek Kesha's support.

The press release has been pulled from the website and should be posted soon in a more accurate form.

So, we should take this to mean that the official position of LaRouchePAC is that Roy LaVerne Brooks was not actually seeking a LaRouche endorsement, but rather support from Kesha Rogers.

More soon.


The original press release:

PRESS RELEASE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

`Candidate of Change' Image Takes a Hit in Texas

June 1, 2008 (EIRNS)-This release was issued on May 31 by the Lyndon
LaRouche Political Action Committee (LPAC).

On the eve of the Texas Democratic Party state convention, which opens
next Thursday in Austin, the national Obama campaign has demonstrated again
that it has no interest in the young voters it has activated, except to have
them cast a vote for Obama, then disappear from sight. Texas Party Vice
Chairwoman, Roy LaVerne Brooks, who is a candidate for state Chair at the
upcoming convention, was told by Rudy Shank, from the national Obama
campaign, that she should drop out of the race, "because they would like a
convention without hurt feelings."

Brooks, who cut her teeth in Texas politics working with former U.S.
House Speaker Jim Wright, asked Kesha Rogers and the LaRouchePAC to back her
candidacy for state Chair. She agreed that the content of her campaign
should be the concept put forward by Lyndon LaRouche in his "Bind the
Wounds" statement, and not centered around the "phenomenon" of Obama. She
has run her campaign based on the idea of returning the Party to the
tradition of FDR and the American System, and recruiting new voters to this
perspective. As a result, she has been endorsed by some leaders among the
Hispanic Dems, who are backers of Hillary.

However, she came under pressure last week from the national Obama
camp, which pushed her to turn on black leaders who were not supporting
Obama. Kesha Rogers advised her she would never win on the basis of racial
identity, nor by attaching herself to a media cooked-up rock star persona,
and that, instead, the deeper issue to take up in her campaign is that of
developing among new voters an understanding of the real issue, FDR vs. the
Brits, and winning them over to the FDR tradition, rather than the
opportunistic approach of the faith-based, Elmer Gantry delivery system.

Over the last two days, the national Obama campaign changed its
approach. Roy LaVerne was contacted by Rudy Shank, who was sent by the
national campaign to Texas, to produce an "harmonic outcome" at the Texas
convention. As part of this strategy, she was told she should drop out of
the race for state chair. If she refused, the Obama campaign would take away
her status as a superdelegate.

If she agreed to this demand, her status as a superdelegate would be
maintained, even though her term as Vice-Chair ends at the conclusion of the
state convention.

When she briefed Kesha on these developments, we told her she should
fight this, by going public. She hesitated until yesterday, when it was
announced that the incumbent State Chair, and her opponent, Boyd Richie, has
endorsed Obama, thus making it clear that the Obama campaign had gone behind
her back. Richie, who is a flunkey for the existing Democratic Party
establishment in Texas - which is essentially the same DLC-types who have
destroyed the state party - had been uncommitted.

In the May 30 Houston Chronicle, political columnist Rick Casey ran an
article on this battle, under the headline "An Obama mystery at state meet."
Casey makes the obvious point in his reporting on this scandal:

"There are ironies in the request by an Obama operative that Brooks
back off the chairman's race.

"One is that she is an African-American. The state Democratic chairman
has traditionally been a white male, with an occasional white female
slipping in.

"Another is that Brooks is casting herself as a 'change' from the good
ol' boy system. Brooks' chances of unseating Richie are enhanced by several
thousand change-oriented newcomers who will swell the convention to about
triple its normal size.

"All this begs the question: Why would the national Obama campaign
involve itself in a state [chair] race?"

After reviewing the business-as-usual monkey business in the Texas
Democratic Party, in which minorities are taken for granted, and given
secondary, token roles, Casey concludes his article as follows:

"Brooks said she told Shank she would stay in the race. "'I made the
comment that I may need to jump over to Hillary's side because I'm not going
to be treated like a dish rag,' she said.

"I asked if she was serious.

"'I'm very serious if they keep trying to get me out of the race and I
learn that Obama is behind it,' she said."

These developments confirm what Lyndon LaRouche had said six weeks
ago, when he was given a report from Kesha Rogers from the district caucuses
which had convened to choose the national delegates. Kesha reported that,
despite the influx of thousands of new people, who had been activated by the
rock-star-hype around Obama, the Obama delegate slots were going to the old
party hacks. Lyndon LaRouche said that this is the clear pattern, that
Rohatyn, Pelosi, Dean, were going to use these young voters - many of who
have been mobilized as MySpace/Facebook zombies - for their votes, then cast
them aside.

This morning, LaRouche said this fits the pattern of the effort, by
the DNC, to disenfranchise the primary voters in Florida and Michigan, at
their meeting on May 31.

Kesha Rogers is presently at a Credentials Committee meeting, asking
leading Democrats what they think of how the Obama campaign has lined up
with the British in Africa, while organizing to keep the plantation system
in the Texas Dem Party. She said that there is recognition of the problem,
and both anger and discomfort over it. (HCS)

For your reference, this is the Chronicle article referenced in the release.

There's quite a bit to get into here. We'll be examining this and other events in upcoming news reports and analyses on the race for Texas Democratic Party Chair.

Someone Needs A New PR Flack

I'm in Oregon until Wednesday, but I couldn't wait to comment on this release.

If there's one thing that a candidate casting themselves as the really-real outsider ought to avoid, it's associating herself with a group who denigrates the very people she seeks to represent. Stereotyping newly mobilized voters as "Myspace/Facebook zombies" is foolishly amateur and it makes her sound like a Luddite.

Another one from the "You're not helping" department

All the way around on this one. Seeking endorsement and/or taking advice or PR help from the LaRouches? The more I think about what has transpired here, the more concerns I have. Richie and Brooks have both done good things for the party, but nothing smells right about any of this. I'm glad not to be a delegate this year.

Steve Southwell
WhosPlayin? Blog: http://www.whosplayin.com

Supporting a convicted con man's cult is not progressive folks.

How is it that progressive Dems are being conned by a cult led by an 85 year old convicted anti semitic mad man who has been doing this for decades and decades? Larouche and the cult know that to spread his lunacy they have to con Dems which is why they call themselves FDR Dems and use the anger against Bush and Cheney to hoodwink Democrats.

Larouche and his followers have been doing dirty tricks on behalf of the GOP in every election. Larouche and the cult can spin in any direction to raise money and recruit naive college kids to drop out of school and worship around the clock for a few bucks a day. How can a Democratic org which on one hand fights to raise the minimum wage give the time of day to a cult leader who sets up his devotees as "volunteers" ? The cult works them around the clock through a myriad of corporate shells and fundraising schemes until they are burnt out and left to rot like most of his older members in their Leesburg Virginia HQ.

Do you really want to be associated with a crazed cult which has it's members set up card table shrines for Larouche with signs that say "Stop Al Gore from eating African babies"?

http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/06/02/it-must-be-june-because-the-silly-...

Here is an internal memo by the cult whre Laoruche tells you what he thinks of Obama.

" I mean: Obama is a racist. I mean, with an African father--he wasn't much of an African father, but was an African father of Kenya. He was part of a British operation, which took over Kenya, through MI5's operation. But this guy was away from Kenya, and he married a Margaret Mead type, a woman who had a number of successive husbands, like Margaret Mead did. Went out to the poor, brown people, in Asia, and had sex with them! It was called "Coming in Samoa." [groans, laughter] And she wore through a number of successive husbands, and by them, had various children. And therefore, you'll find Obama's ancestry, if you chase his family tree, everybody's climbing and swinging from the branches there--from all over the world! All parts of the world! This guy is the universal man. Every monkey in every tree, from every part of the world, has participated in the sexual act of producing him. And he works for organized crime--which is a branch of British intelligence.

So why are people sucked into this thing? And what's wrong with the way we react to this phenomenon, as it affects the population in general? It's not just Obama. Obama is a disease, but he's not the infectious agent that caused the disease. He's a product of the disease, not a cause of it."

Just do a search about Larouche and "Cult" "crime" "Jews" and see what kind of lunatic unsuspecting Dems have been unwittingly promoting. When you give the time of day to this creepy cult they will use that to call more Dems for money for Larouche and try to convince another naive college kid to drop out of school and follow this lunacy.

Try sites like

justiceforjeremiah.com

laroucheplanet.org

lyndonlarouchewatch.org

kennethkronberg.com

factnet.org and do a larouche or larouche youth movement search .

Source it

Regardless of how you feel about LaRouche, that's a hotly racist block of quote there. Do you have a source for it other than lyndonlarouchewatch.org? The page that contains that quote is here, and Wonkette cited the same page here, but one anti-source source and one citation does not a verified quote make.

If it is true, it is worth reporting. If it isn't true or can't be verified, it is just perpetuating something that, er, can't be verified.

I'm gonna see if I can get a statement from LaRouchePAC about this quote.

Laoruche cult insanity

The quotes are from an internal meeting Larouche conducted with his "Larouche Youth" (the name alone should creep anyone out). It was part of what is called "the daily briefing" which sent out each morning to the membership. The briefing is both marching orders and a non stop continuous replay of end of the world lunacy to keep the cult going around the clock. What is in it always "proves" that the cult leader is correct and humanity is doomed unless Larouche's visions are carried out. No Sh*t, this is as crazy as it sounds and has been going on for decades.

Here is something to show you how the lunacy erupts and is shared among the cult.

When Al Gore was VP there were several articles about how he changed the landscaping at the VP estate to reflect native plants to promote using less resources high pesticide gardening. How did the cult view this?

Well, they wrote a big article about how this "proves' that Al Gore is a Nazi and is part of a world wide conspiracy to eliminate a few billion dark skinned people!

Read it here:

http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2007/2007_10-19/2007_10-19/2007-13...

IS THAT HITLER IN YOUR GARDEN? NO THAT'S AL GORE.

"When Al Gore was Vice President, living at the mansion in the park of U.S. Naval Observatory, he embarked on a project to restore the grounds, especially the gardens and forest.An article describing this project at the time Gore was
running for President, stated, "Gore restored the rich diversity and lush beauty of his own backyard by yanking out FOREIGN EXOTICA IN FAVOR OF NATIVE PLANTS."(emphasis added; www. homegardens.move.com ). Treating plants as if they were unwanted foreigners from the "mixed races of the south" or other unwanted immigrants under orders from Gore, the gardeners "dug out all exotic plants," including such "invasive" immigrants as English ivy and garlic mustard from
Europe and Kudzu from Japan. Gore's interest in gardens comes from the same fascist roots as his lying CO2 campaign that could make Joseph Goebbels blush "

There are pages and pages of rantings from Larouche about Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi and other demented delusions. In the cult's mind and memos they firmly believe that Hillary is being attacked as part of a conspiracy because Larouche is involved in guiding her!

Do not get fooled by seeing an African American and wondering about how Larouche can be so wicked about Obama. This is a cult of personality and nothing more. The LarouchePac raised several millions form their boiler roms but issued a thousand or so dollars to Dem candidates when you view FEC records over the years. Larouche has a lot of experience in using different ethnic and religions to find money and recruits while he wails away against them.

Ask Ms Rogers if she is paid the minumum wage along with the rest of the cult's members around the country? The cult classifies her as a "volunteer" and uses that to avoid spending any more money than what is needed to keep Ms Rogers from starving. When she needs more health care and her costs rise, she will become like several hundred older members she knows who are pushed out by Larouche.

Ms Rogers should tell you about how she files income taxes if the money which is spent by LarouchePac on the expenses of the cult members is reported as taxable income . In this model you pay members less taxable income and report it as an expense somewhere else.

Ms Rogers can also tell you about just how much the cult has paid back to the elderly supporters whose money they stole in the 1980s when larouche and many of his fundraisers were convicted and sent to prison. She may tell you some baloney that "Larouche is a political prisoner". She was just born when we were stealing millions and has been kept very ignorant of the several decades of daily Larouche lunacy .

Ms Rogers was just a baby when the cult worked hand in hand with GOP operatives and spread rumours about Michael Dukakis being treated for mental illness during that election. Larouche did a lot of dirty work against the Democratic party and sends in his cult like cock roaches who fool local clubs by being anti Bush and channeling FDR through Larouche.

These are not Democrats, not volunteers and nothing more than a cult led by a madman who needs young naive fools like Ms Rogers to drop out of college and spend their prime years keeping him alive in his delusionary world of mythical enemies and plots against him.

2006

Did they not field an African American female in her 20s for state party chair in 2006? So I really can't go along with the "LaRouche PAC is racist" bit.

Yeah

That was Kesha Rogers, named in the press release.

Syndicate content