Skip navigation.
The Texas Blue
Advancing Progressive Ideas

News Roundup, 5/23/08: An Empty (Veto) Threat

The Bush White House can continue playing offense, but it is growing increasingly clearer that all his players are leaving the field.

The Iraq funding bill that passed the Senate yesterday was tied to a number of domestic programs for fighting wildfires, restoring levees in Louisiana and Mississippi, and boosting health research. Of course, this would fall subject to Bush's blanket veto threat on any military spending bill tied to domestic spending programs. Much to his chagrin, the bill passed the Senate by a 75-22 vote, well above the margin needed to override a veto. The large number of Republican defections come as the embattled party has to play defense to improve their chances of reelection in a cycle that is otherwise looking to be a big win for Democrats.

Even John McCain's having to play some defense, it turns out. Three months after controversial pastor John Hagee gave John McCain his endorsement — an endorsement McCain would not turn down, despite inflammatory statements by Hagee attacking the Catholic Church as "the great whore" — McCain has finally been forced to reject Hagee's support when audio began circulating from a Hagee sermon in the late 1990's saying that Hitler was sent by God to hunt European Jews into Palestine. It's nice to know there is some line of propriety that McCain won't cross to get an endorsement. I'm sure that comes as a disappointment to the folks at the American National Socialist Workers Party that were hoping to get another GOP candidate to speak for them.

House Judiciary Committee chair John Conyers is getting tough on Karl Rove. After long negotiations trying to get Rove to appear of his own volition in front of the committee, Conyers has issued a subpoena for Rove's appearance. The subpoena sets a July 10 deadline for his appearance. Bush has been using the tactic of trying to shield all his ex-employees under executive privilege, and Congress has answered in the past by voting to hold Bolten and Miers in contempt of Congress, allowing them to file a civil suit against the administration to force them to testify. It would seem that this may go the same direction; we'll see if Rep. Conyers has another trick up his sleeve.

In presidential news, it seems Senator Barack Obama has secretly started looking for a vice-presidential candidate. Shh! Don't tell anybody.

Will that candidate be Hillary Clinton? I personally don't think so. And neither does Jimmy Carter.

Bill White is going to bat for the environment, and is taking the fight to Austin. After a number of efforts challenging the permits of Houston-area plants for not lowering their benzene output, White has notified the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality that he would be publicly calling for the agency to establish overall limits on airborne benzene. The move met with great support from environmental groups, who decried the TCEQ's underwhelming efforts in the matter.

Josh interviews Larry Joe Doherty in yesterday's Who's Blue; they discuss his platform in his race for CD 10 and his opponent, Michael McCaul, as well as touch on his experiences on his court TV show, Texas Justice.

One last note: we have expanded the number of news articles we're showing on our front page, in anticipation of a snazzy new redesign of our site. Since we'll be showing all our recent stories on our front page now, we will no longer be putting roundups on the Web site. If you'd like to continue receiving these, join our mailing list where we'll send out digests of our most recent content. And as always, thanks for reading.

In Regards to the Larry Joe Doherty Interview

Does anyone understand why Congressman Michael McCaul voted against the recent GI Bill in Congress??? Well truth is, and it may come as a surprise to Larry Joe Doherty who recently bashed McCaul in his latest interview with Josh, that McCaul CO-SPONSORED the initial Bill expanding GI education benefits, but like most Republicans was forced to vote against it last week because the Democrats were paying for the "expansion" with $50 BILLION in small business TAXES. I'm sure, as I have seen, that McCaul would love to see this bill passed seeing that he co-sponsored the intial bill...In regards, Michael McCaul's own father flew a B17 bombardier squadron over Normandy on D-Day. He is fighting for all of us, veterans included, and this is why we need to take Michael McCaul back to Washington in November.

-The Truth Seeker

Please.

No one is ever forced to vote one way or another, and to claim it is to offload all responsibility as an elected official. If I had a nickel for every time Republican legislators used the excuse that they were "forced" to vote against something that would actually do some good just because the bill came with a realistic plan to pay for what it proposed to do, I would be filthy with nickels, sir.

Filthy. With nickels.

Ok...

The term forced focuses on the $50 BILLION in small business TAXES that McCaul stands strongly against. He will do what is right for all Veterans including those who own small businesses. Those small business owners, and veterans will all take him back to Washington for 4 more years.

Thank you sir.

"Things" cost "money"

The $50 billion in taxes is where the money for the program would come from. For a program to help veterans, or the elderly, or kittens, or whatever, you have to have money.

The conservative idea that taxes are bad is nothing more than entitlement, and it is as old as rhyme: the idea that government should be required to do things without money.

Or that, for instance, veterans should be given help to pay for a college education (which should be totally free for veterans anyways), but only if the money comes from some magical source that requires zero sacrifice from the American people. The idea that TAXES are BAD is NOTHING but a term of ENTITLEMENT, of ISOLATIONIST INDIVIDUAL WELFARE FREE RIDERISM. College should at the very least be totally free for veterans, but it isn't. You can thank conservatives and 40 years of nonsensical railing against taxes for that and other hideous, lurching injustices and inequities between how things ought to be and how things actually are.

Paying taxes is patriotic. When people complain about taxes (usually by saying that the Democrats are going to raise them), what they are really saying is that they want to enjoy what government does for them and everyone else without being bothered to put in their share to pay for any of it, including the roads they drive on (like everyone else), the schools their children attend (along with everyone else's kids), the firemen who are there to keep their house from burning down (along with everyone else's house), or the military that keeps them safe (along with everyone else).

People that rail against taxes are fundamentally unpatriotic, and don't truly support our troops, their neighbors, kids, old people, or even their own families. Can you honestly tell me that veterans shouldn't be given a free college education after all they've given to our country? Or would the simple act of paying for it "force" conservative elected officials to vote against veterans, to deny them a chance at college despite their sacrifices?

(P.S. While I am sure his supporters would love to send McCaul back to the House for four more years, they can only do it two years at a time. McCaul is a member of the House of Representatives, and members of the House serve two years at a time. Not four.)

Syndicate content